<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1421 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304055</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted where the petitioner was 28 years old, had no other criminal case pending, and the investigation had been completed. The Court noted that trial had not yet begun and was likely to take time, while the question whether the petitioner knew the documents were forged was left for determination at trial. On those facts, continued custody was not considered necessary and the petitioner was released on bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 07:23:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1421 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304055</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted where the petitioner was 28 years old, had no other criminal case pending, and the investigation had been completed. The Court noted that trial had not yet begun and was likely to take time, while the question whether the petitioner knew the documents were forged was left for determination at trial. On those facts, continued custody was not considered necessary and the petitioner was released on bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>