https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304060 The Tribunal excluded the period from 20.03.2020 till the date of the application, directing the IRP to proceed accordingly. The Corporate Debtor was instructed to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 promptly, and the issue regarding IBBI's action against the applicant was deemed sub judice pending the NCLT's decision. The recall of the order dated 06.07.2021 was not elaborated upon, and the communication delay of the CIRP initiation order due to the Registry's failure was considered significant. The Tribunal also addressed the appointment of the IRP and the change of name, ultimately disposing of the application. en-us Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Sep 2022 07:23:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304060 The Tribunal excluded the period from 20.03.2020 till the date of the application, directing the IRP to proceed accordingly. The Corporate Debtor was instructed to deposit Rs. 2,00,000 promptly, and the issue regarding IBBI's action against the applicant was deemed sub judice pending the NCLT's decision. The recall of the order dated 06.07.2021 was not elaborated upon, and the communication delay of the CIRP initiation order due to the Registry's failure was considered significant. The Tribunal also addressed the appointment of the IRP and the change of name, ultimately disposing of the application. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304060