<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 196 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427251</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s Order for the Assessment Year 2007-08, which relied on the Sony Ericsson judgment and rejected the Bright Line Test application. The Court emphasized that zero attribution in AMP expenses could be possible in specific cases and that the Bright Line Test is not a statutory mandate. Despite pending challenges in the Supreme Court, the appeal was dismissed as it aligned with the decisions in Sony Ericsson and Bausch &amp;amp; Lomb cases, with the order subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court in the Sony Ericsson case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 196 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427251</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s Order for the Assessment Year 2007-08, which relied on the Sony Ericsson judgment and rejected the Bright Line Test application. The Court emphasized that zero attribution in AMP expenses could be possible in specific cases and that the Bright Line Test is not a statutory mandate. Despite pending challenges in the Supreme Court, the appeal was dismissed as it aligned with the decisions in Sony Ericsson and Bausch &amp;amp; Lomb cases, with the order subject to the final decision of the Supreme Court in the Sony Ericsson case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>