<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 184 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15. The additions made on account of alleged on-money and the application of a net profit rate of 17.5% were deleted. The Tribunal held that the statement of Mr. Devji Sorathia was unreliable, and there was no basis for the additions made by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 184 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15. The additions made on account of alleged on-money and the application of a net profit rate of 17.5% were deleted. The Tribunal held that the statement of Mr. Devji Sorathia was unreliable, and there was no basis for the additions made by the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>