<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1229 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304047</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted where the Court applied the settled principle that personal liberty is the rule and pre-trial detention requires specific, substantial justification. Although the record included voice recordings, transcripts and trap recovery, their evidentiary value was left to trial and the case was only at a prima facie stage. The Court found no credible risk of absconding, tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, noting that the main evidence was documentary, the investigation was substantially complete, and family circumstances also supported release. Bail was therefore allowed subject to conditions, without any opinion on the merits of the prosecution case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 15:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1229 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304047</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted where the Court applied the settled principle that personal liberty is the rule and pre-trial detention requires specific, substantial justification. Although the record included voice recordings, transcripts and trap recovery, their evidentiary value was left to trial and the case was only at a prima facie stage. The Court found no credible risk of absconding, tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses, noting that the main evidence was documentary, the investigation was substantially complete, and family circumstances also supported release. Bail was therefore allowed subject to conditions, without any opinion on the merits of the prosecution case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>