https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304046 Conviction for kidnapping, abduction, rape and criminal intimidation was found unsustainable because the prosecutrix's versions in the DDR, FIR, Section 161 CrPC statement and Section 164 CrPC statement were materially inconsistent. The accused's name did not appear in the initial version, the delay in lodging the FIR remained unexplained, and the surrounding circumstances suggested that the prosecutrix had left the house voluntarily. The allegation of rape was not consistently attributed to the appellant, creating reasonable doubt on the prosecution case, and the appellant was entitled to acquittal. en-us Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Sep 2022 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304046 Conviction for kidnapping, abduction, rape and criminal intimidation was found unsustainable because the prosecutrix's versions in the DDR, FIR, Section 161 CrPC statement and Section 164 CrPC statement were materially inconsistent. The accused's name did not appear in the initial version, the delay in lodging the FIR remained unexplained, and the surrounding circumstances suggested that the prosecutrix had left the house voluntarily. The allegation of rape was not consistently attributed to the appellant, creating reasonable doubt on the prosecution case, and the appellant was entitled to acquittal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304046