<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Misuse Alleged in 2004: No Business Transactions Between Parties from 1990-2004, Debt Legality Questioned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65447</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - existence of legally enforceable debt or not - It has been clearly proved that there was absolutely no business transaction between them from the year 1990 and 2004 and the disputed cheque marked as Exhibit 1 had been kept as security and was misused by the complainant to harass the respondent company in the year 2004, after 15 years. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:01:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:01:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Misuse Alleged in 2004: No Business Transactions Between Parties from 1990-2004, Debt Legality Questioned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65447</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - existence of legally enforceable debt or not - It has been clearly proved that there was absolutely no business transaction between them from the year 1990 and 2004 and the disputed cheque marked as Exhibit 1 had been kept as security and was misused by the complainant to harass the respondent company in the year 2004, after 15 years. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:01:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>