<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 158 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427213</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of the section 54F deduction of Rs.3.25 crores, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s reinvestment of capital gains in a new residential property through a development agreement. The tribunal found no violation of section 54F and invoked a stricter interpretation in favor of the appellant, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on 1st September 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 08:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 158 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427213</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of the section 54F deduction of Rs.3.25 crores, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s reinvestment of capital gains in a new residential property through a development agreement. The tribunal found no violation of section 54F and invoked a stricter interpretation in favor of the appellant, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on 1st September 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>