<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 145 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427200</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of Depreciation on Buildings and the addition of unpaid service tax liability under section 43-B of the Act. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot alter the Written Down Value based on a valuation report prepared for a different purpose and clarified that section 43B applies only when a deduction is claimed, leading to the deletion of the disallowances made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 145 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427200</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowance of Depreciation on Buildings and the addition of unpaid service tax liability under section 43-B of the Act. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer cannot alter the Written Down Value based on a valuation report prepared for a different purpose and clarified that section 43B applies only when a deduction is claimed, leading to the deletion of the disallowances made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>