<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 131 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the unamended provisions of Section 35FF applied, and since the refund was made within three months, no interest was payable on the delayed refund of the pre-deposit amount. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order directing payment of interest under the amended provisions, rejecting the respondent&#039;s cross-objection for a higher interest rate. The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 07:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 131 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the unamended provisions of Section 35FF applied, and since the refund was made within three months, no interest was payable on the delayed refund of the pre-deposit amount. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order directing payment of interest under the amended provisions, rejecting the respondent&#039;s cross-objection for a higher interest rate. The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>