https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427169 The court upheld the appellate authority's decision directing the assessing officer to credit a seized amount of Rs.50,00,000 against the tax demand. Despite subsequent orders, the assessing officer failed to comply, leading to a representation by the petitioner. A writ petition was filed, mandating the disposal of the representation. The court clarified the status of the seized cash and allowed the petitioner to appeal the non-grant of credit against a previous order, addressing concerns of potential double taxation. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal within four weeks for resolution by the Commissioner (Appeals). en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Sep 2022 08:04:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427169 The court upheld the appellate authority's decision directing the assessing officer to credit a seized amount of Rs.50,00,000 against the tax demand. Despite subsequent orders, the assessing officer failed to comply, leading to a representation by the petitioner. A writ petition was filed, mandating the disposal of the representation. The court clarified the status of the seized cash and allowed the petitioner to appeal the non-grant of credit against a previous order, addressing concerns of potential double taxation. The petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal within four weeks for resolution by the Commissioner (Appeals). Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427169