<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 112 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427167</link>
    <description>An order stopping proceedings under Section 258 CrPC before the stage at which an acquittal can be pronounced has the effect of discharge, not acquittal. Because the complaint was closed on a memo without a completed trial or evidentiary stage leading to acquittal, an appeal under Section 378 CrPC was not maintainable. The proper remedy lay in revision under Section 397 CrPC, and the request to convert the appeals into revision petitions was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 112 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427167</link>
      <description>An order stopping proceedings under Section 258 CrPC before the stage at which an acquittal can be pronounced has the effect of discharge, not acquittal. Because the complaint was closed on a memo without a completed trial or evidentiary stage leading to acquittal, an appeal under Section 378 CrPC was not maintainable. The proper remedy lay in revision under Section 397 CrPC, and the request to convert the appeals into revision petitions was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>