<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427165</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the SEBI Circular applies to debenture holders implementing a Resolution Plan, with consent requirements specified. The court affirmed the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction to entertain challenges to regulatory circulars. The SEBI Circular was given retroactive effect, overriding conflicting provisions in the Debenture Trust Deed. Dissenting debenture holders are bound by the ICA/Resolution Plan if approved by the requisite majority. The court invoked Article 142 to uphold the Resolution Plan, safeguarding small investors&#039; interests. The appeal was partially allowed, with directions under Article 142 to protect retail debenture holders and ensure Resolution Plan implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 110 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427165</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the SEBI Circular applies to debenture holders implementing a Resolution Plan, with consent requirements specified. The court affirmed the civil court&#039;s jurisdiction to entertain challenges to regulatory circulars. The SEBI Circular was given retroactive effect, overriding conflicting provisions in the Debenture Trust Deed. Dissenting debenture holders are bound by the ICA/Resolution Plan if approved by the requisite majority. The court invoked Article 142 to uphold the Resolution Plan, safeguarding small investors&#039; interests. The appeal was partially allowed, with directions under Article 142 to protect retail debenture holders and ensure Resolution Plan implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>