https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304033 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, ruling that the plaintiff did not prove the custom of succession or his installation as Mahant. The court found the nomination of the first defendant valid based on ability and character, not just seniority. Deeds of nomination and surrender were deemed binding. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded against the plaintiff. en-us Tue, 04 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:10:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304033 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, ruling that the plaintiff did not prove the custom of succession or his installation as Mahant. The court found the nomination of the first defendant valid based on ability and character, not just seniority. Deeds of nomination and surrender were deemed binding. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded against the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304033