<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1598 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304027</link>
    <description>In a composite hospital procedure, the mere recovery of charges for surgery, medicines and consumables does not by itself create a taxable sale of implanted stents or valves. Applying the controlling Division Bench precedent, the Allahabad HC noted that implantation of a stent or valve during surgery remains part of medical treatment and does not fall within &quot;sale&quot; under Section 2(ac) of the U.P. VAT Act. The contrary treatment in the impugned assessment orders could not stand against that binding view, and the assessment orders were therefore liable to be quashed, while the assessing authority retained liberty to complete the final assessment on all relevant material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1598 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304027</link>
      <description>In a composite hospital procedure, the mere recovery of charges for surgery, medicines and consumables does not by itself create a taxable sale of implanted stents or valves. Applying the controlling Division Bench precedent, the Allahabad HC noted that implantation of a stent or valve during surgery remains part of medical treatment and does not fall within &quot;sale&quot; under Section 2(ac) of the U.P. VAT Act. The contrary treatment in the impugned assessment orders could not stand against that binding view, and the assessment orders were therefore liable to be quashed, while the assessing authority retained liberty to complete the final assessment on all relevant material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>