<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 104 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427159</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue notice under Section 153C for the assessment year 2007-08. Consequently, the assessment framed under Section 153C read with Section 143(3) was deemed invalid, leading to the quashing of the assessment. The Tribunal did not address the classification of the Joint Development Agreement or the timing of income recognition due to the jurisdictional issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:21:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 104 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427159</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue notice under Section 153C for the assessment year 2007-08. Consequently, the assessment framed under Section 153C read with Section 143(3) was deemed invalid, leading to the quashing of the assessment. The Tribunal did not address the classification of the Joint Development Agreement or the timing of income recognition due to the jurisdictional issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>