<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 101 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427156</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a case involving the disallowance of bad debts written off and Attimari Coolie expenses. The disallowance of bad debts was limited to Rs.6,14,213 due to insufficient evidence for certain debts, while the disallowance of Attimari Coolie expenses was capped at 25% of the total claimed amount. The ITAT found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 101 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427156</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in a case involving the disallowance of bad debts written off and Attimari Coolie expenses. The disallowance of bad debts was limited to Rs.6,14,213 due to insufficient evidence for certain debts, while the disallowance of Attimari Coolie expenses was capped at 25% of the total claimed amount. The ITAT found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings, resulting in the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>