<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction as there was no connection between the reasons recorded and the additions made during the assessment under Section 147/143(3). Since no additions were made based on the reasons for reopening the case, the Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:21:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction as there was no connection between the reasons recorded and the additions made during the assessment under Section 147/143(3). Since no additions were made based on the reasons for reopening the case, the Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer exceeded jurisdiction. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>