<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 98 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427153</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 5,81,861/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the amendment to Section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, was not retrospective and did not apply to the assessment year in question (2017-18). Following the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision, the Tribunal ruled that no disallowance was warranted as the assessee had not earned any tax-free income during the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 98 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427153</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 5,81,861/- under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the amendment to Section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, was not retrospective and did not apply to the assessment year in question (2017-18). Following the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision, the Tribunal ruled that no disallowance was warranted as the assessee had not earned any tax-free income during the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>