<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 82 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the assessing officer&#039;s decision that payments to NEBU constituted Royalty and Fees for Technical Services, requiring the assessee to withhold tax at source. The appellate order was upheld, dismissing the appeal due to the lack of contradictory judgments on Royalty interpretation under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 82 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the assessing officer&#039;s decision that payments to NEBU constituted Royalty and Fees for Technical Services, requiring the assessee to withhold tax at source. The appellate order was upheld, dismissing the appeal due to the lack of contradictory judgments on Royalty interpretation under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>