<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 64 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Rectification applications, upholding the Final Order. It found the demand for duty was not based on reliable documents and lacked necessary certification, making the data retrieved from the computer unreliable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of reliable evidence and proper adherence to legal requirements in confirming duty demands, maintaining judicial integrity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 08:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 64 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Rectification applications, upholding the Final Order. It found the demand for duty was not based on reliable documents and lacked necessary certification, making the data retrieved from the computer unreliable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of reliable evidence and proper adherence to legal requirements in confirming duty demands, maintaining judicial integrity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>