<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 60 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427115</link>
    <description>Hospital supplies of medicines, implants, stents, lenses and other consumables to in-patients were held to form part of composite health care services rather than a separate sale. Applying the aspect doctrine and the dominant nature test, the Court reasoned that such supplies are naturally bundled with treatment, lodging, nursing care and related hospital services, and do not acquire an independent taxable character merely because consideration is separately or generally recovered. Entry 86 of Schedule IV was held inapplicable to these composite transactions. The State therefore lacked competence to levy VAT on the impugned in-patient supplies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 60 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427115</link>
      <description>Hospital supplies of medicines, implants, stents, lenses and other consumables to in-patients were held to form part of composite health care services rather than a separate sale. Applying the aspect doctrine and the dominant nature test, the Court reasoned that such supplies are naturally bundled with treatment, lodging, nursing care and related hospital services, and do not acquire an independent taxable character merely because consideration is separately or generally recovered. Entry 86 of Schedule IV was held inapplicable to these composite transactions. The State therefore lacked competence to levy VAT on the impugned in-patient supplies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>