https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427100 Section 167 CrPC does not create an absolute bar on police custody remand after fifteen days from arrest where the investigating agency has acted with due diligence and the question of remand was not finally determined within that period. The HC distinguished the cited precedent because the accused had not been remanded to judicial custody after police custody was initially refused. On those peculiar facts, the delayed order granting seven days' police remand was held valid, since the continued investigation of a serious economic offence could not be defeated merely by the timing of the revisional order. en-us Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Apr 2025 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427100 Section 167 CrPC does not create an absolute bar on police custody remand after fifteen days from arrest where the investigating agency has acted with due diligence and the question of remand was not finally determined within that period. The HC distinguished the cited precedent because the accused had not been remanded to judicial custody after police custody was initially refused. On those peculiar facts, the delayed order granting seven days' police remand was held valid, since the continued investigation of a serious economic offence could not be defeated merely by the timing of the revisional order. Case-Laws GST Mon, 22 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427100