https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427099 CESTAT Allahabad rejected appellant's appeal for non-compliance with mandatory pre-deposit under section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appellant attempted to make pre-deposit by debiting Electronic Credit Ledger under GST Act, which tribunal held was impermissible. Citing precedent, tribunal ruled mandatory excise pre-deposit cannot be made through CGST credit ledger debit. Appeal dismissed but appellant granted four weeks to cure defect by making proper pre-deposit to remove procedural non-compliance. en-us Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Apr 2025 11:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427099 CESTAT Allahabad rejected appellant's appeal for non-compliance with mandatory pre-deposit under section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appellant attempted to make pre-deposit by debiting Electronic Credit Ledger under GST Act, which tribunal held was impermissible. Citing precedent, tribunal ruled mandatory excise pre-deposit cannot be made through CGST credit ledger debit. Appeal dismissed but appellant granted four weeks to cure defect by making proper pre-deposit to remove procedural non-compliance. Case-Laws GST Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427099