<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427094</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the appeal, upholding the rejection of the claim for amortization of lease premium as Revenue Expenditure. The court considered the terms of the lease deed with various Authorities and compared it to a similar case where the expenditure was deemed capital. The decision was influenced by a Coordinate Bench ruling in a related case, pending the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment on the challenged case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427094</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the appeal, upholding the rejection of the claim for amortization of lease premium as Revenue Expenditure. The court considered the terms of the lease deed with various Authorities and compared it to a similar case where the expenditure was deemed capital. The decision was influenced by a Coordinate Bench ruling in a related case, pending the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment on the challenged case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>