<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 33 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the disallowance of royalty payment based on precedents and the nature of the expenditure. The decision highlighted the importance of previous Tribunal rulings in determining the allowability of expenses, particularly in cases involving related parties and royalty payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 33 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the disallowance of royalty payment based on precedents and the nature of the expenditure. The decision highlighted the importance of previous Tribunal rulings in determining the allowability of expenses, particularly in cases involving related parties and royalty payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>