<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 21 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427076</link>
    <description>An appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was held maintainable only at the instance of an aggrieved person, and ex-director and employee appellants were found not to have shown sufficient legal interest to challenge the order. The Tribunal also held that accumulated cash profits lying in the corporate debtor&#039;s bank account during liquidation could be distributed under the liquidation framework, because the order did not concern sale proceeds of liquidation assets and there was no breach of Section 53 of the Code or Regulations 32, 41 and 42 of the Liquidation Process Regulations. The impugned order was upheld and the challenge dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 21 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427076</link>
      <description>An appeal under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was held maintainable only at the instance of an aggrieved person, and ex-director and employee appellants were found not to have shown sufficient legal interest to challenge the order. The Tribunal also held that accumulated cash profits lying in the corporate debtor&#039;s bank account during liquidation could be distributed under the liquidation framework, because the order did not concern sale proceeds of liquidation assets and there was no breach of Section 53 of the Code or Regulations 32, 41 and 42 of the Liquidation Process Regulations. The impugned order was upheld and the challenge dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>