<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 8 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427063</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid on club or association services remained subject to the statutory limitation under Section 11B, as applied through Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. Because the assessee had voluntarily paid the tax and filed the refund claims long after payment, the claims were barred by time. The argument that limitation should run only from the later Supreme Court ruling in Calcutta Club Limited was rejected, as that decision did not reset limitation for all similarly placed taxpayers. The refund rejection was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 8 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427063</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid on club or association services remained subject to the statutory limitation under Section 11B, as applied through Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. Because the assessee had voluntarily paid the tax and filed the refund claims long after payment, the claims were barred by time. The argument that limitation should run only from the later Supreme Court ruling in Calcutta Club Limited was rejected, as that decision did not reset limitation for all similarly placed taxpayers. The refund rejection was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>