<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1298 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for inadvertent mistake in income computation was deleted. The decision was based on legal precedents and the unintentional nature of the error, with the assessee acknowledging and rectifying the mistake promptly. The excess claim of deduction was deemed a bona fide mistake, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 06:49:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1298 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for inadvertent mistake in income computation was deleted. The decision was based on legal precedents and the unintentional nature of the error, with the assessee acknowledging and rectifying the mistake promptly. The excess claim of deduction was deemed a bona fide mistake, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>