<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 1028 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304009</link>
    <description>Central excise appeals were dismissed by the Supreme Court for delay and on merits, leaving the lower outcome undisturbed. The order records no further reasoning and does not state any substantive principle beyond the dismissal. It therefore reflects only the procedural and final disposition of the appeals in the excise matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:09:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 1028 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304009</link>
      <description>Central excise appeals were dismissed by the Supreme Court for delay and on merits, leaving the lower outcome undisturbed. The order records no further reasoning and does not state any substantive principle beyond the dismissal. It therefore reflects only the procedural and final disposition of the appeals in the excise matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>