<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 9D: Witness Examination Essential Before Relying on Statements; Cross-Examination Opportunity Required for Fair Adjudication.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65363</link>
    <description>Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in chief and also to form an opinion - It is a settled principle of law that if the authority wants to rely upon the statement of any witness, the opportunity of cross-examination ought to have been given to enable the party to prove its case. Non-providing of the opportunity of cross-examination amounts to violation of the natural justice and in absence of denial of natural justice, such documents/statements cannot be relied upon. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:01:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 9D: Witness Examination Essential Before Relying on Statements; Cross-Examination Opportunity Required for Fair Adjudication.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65363</link>
      <description>Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in chief and also to form an opinion - It is a settled principle of law that if the authority wants to rely upon the statement of any witness, the opportunity of cross-examination ought to have been given to enable the party to prove its case. Non-providing of the opportunity of cross-examination amounts to violation of the natural justice and in absence of denial of natural justice, such documents/statements cannot be relied upon. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:01:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=65363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>