https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427012 The tribunal set aside the confirmation of duty demand, interest, and penalties in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of excisable goods. It found the evidence insufficient to establish the accusations, emphasizing the lack of concrete proof such as discrepancies in stock or incriminating documents. The penalties imposed on the appellant's partner and broker were annulled, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:01:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427012 The tribunal set aside the confirmation of duty demand, interest, and penalties in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of excisable goods. It found the evidence insufficient to establish the accusations, emphasizing the lack of concrete proof such as discrepancies in stock or incriminating documents. The penalties imposed on the appellant's partner and broker were annulled, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief granted to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427012