<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 16 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30271</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of manufacturers for cash refund under Rule 5 before 14.3.2006 and emphasized the need to fulfill the conditions specified in the notification for granting cash refund. The case was remanded for further examination to ensure compliance with the notification requirements before deciding on the mode of refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 16 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30271</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of manufacturers for cash refund under Rule 5 before 14.3.2006 and emphasized the need to fulfill the conditions specified in the notification for granting cash refund. The case was remanded for further examination to ensure compliance with the notification requirements before deciding on the mode of refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>