https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303983 The Supreme Court found the Appellant's non-empanelment for promotion to Major General contrary to the promotion policy, emphasizing the need for objective evaluation. The Court directed a Review Selection Board to reassess the Appellant's case within six months, setting aside the Tribunal's judgment and allowing the appeal. Additionally, a similar appeal (Civil Appeal No. 5629 of 2017) was also allowed, with the Court ordering reconsideration by a Review Selection Board for the eligible Brigadier not empanelled for promotion despite meeting the criteria. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:05:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303983 The Supreme Court found the Appellant's non-empanelment for promotion to Major General contrary to the promotion policy, emphasizing the need for objective evaluation. The Court directed a Review Selection Board to reassess the Appellant's case within six months, setting aside the Tribunal's judgment and allowing the appeal. Additionally, a similar appeal (Civil Appeal No. 5629 of 2017) was also allowed, with the Court ordering reconsideration by a Review Selection Board for the eligible Brigadier not empanelled for promotion despite meeting the criteria. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303983