<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426985</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2015-16 due to invalid jurisdiction under Section 147. The issues for which the assessments were reopened were not sustained in the final orders. The disallowance of loss on trading of gold jewellery for 2012-13 was not adjudicated on merits, and the transfer pricing adjustment for 2015-16 was not upheld as the primary issue for reopening the assessment was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1224 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426985</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2015-16 due to invalid jurisdiction under Section 147. The issues for which the assessments were reopened were not sustained in the final orders. The disallowance of loss on trading of gold jewellery for 2012-13 was not adjudicated on merits, and the transfer pricing adjustment for 2015-16 was not upheld as the primary issue for reopening the assessment was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>