https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426974 Section 311 CrPC permits recall or further cross-examination only when the additional evidence is essential to a just decision, and the power must be used with circumspection. In a Section 138 NI Act complaint, a request based on change of counsel and repetition of points already covered in earlier cross-examination was rejected because service of notice had already been addressed, the objection on authority to institute the complaint no longer survived after substitution of the bank's authorised representative, and the application appeared to be a delaying tactic rather than a genuine effort to fill an evidentiary gap. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:09:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426974 Section 311 CrPC permits recall or further cross-examination only when the additional evidence is essential to a just decision, and the power must be used with circumspection. In a Section 138 NI Act complaint, a request based on change of counsel and repetition of points already covered in earlier cross-examination was rejected because service of notice had already been addressed, the objection on authority to institute the complaint no longer survived after substitution of the bank's authorised representative, and the application appeared to be a delaying tactic rather than a genuine effort to fill an evidentiary gap. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426974