https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426974 The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the order and for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The court found no merit in the arguments presented by the petitioner, emphasizing that the application was a delaying tactic in a long-pending case. The court held that the issues raised had already been addressed during the trial, and the change of counsel was not a valid ground for recalling a witness. Consequently, the petition was dismissed to avoid further delays in the proceedings related to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed in 2016. en-us Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:09:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426974 The court dismissed the petition seeking to quash the order and for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C. The court found no merit in the arguments presented by the petitioner, emphasizing that the application was a delaying tactic in a long-pending case. The court held that the issues raised had already been addressed during the trial, and the change of counsel was not a valid ground for recalling a witness. Consequently, the petition was dismissed to avoid further delays in the proceedings related to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed in 2016. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426974