https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30263 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to claim a refund of cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacturing process. The judgment emphasized the distinction between exempted goods and goods chargeable to nil rate of duty, affirming the appellant's entitlement to the refund. The case was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner for further verification and necessary action based on the Tribunal's decision. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30263 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to claim a refund of cenvat credit on inputs used in the manufacturing process. The judgment emphasized the distinction between exempted goods and goods chargeable to nil rate of duty, affirming the appellant's entitlement to the refund. The case was remanded to the Assistant Commissioner for further verification and necessary action based on the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30263