https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426966 The Income Tax Department filed an appeal under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for the restoration of the respondent company's name in the register. The Tribunal found restoration necessary to prevent tax evasion and protect revenue interests. The Tribunal asserted its jurisdiction to hear the appeal, emphasizing its authority to adjudicate on the matter. The appeal filed by the Income Tax Department was deemed valid, allowing for the restoration of the company's name to conclude pending assessment proceedings and enforce tax liabilities. Respondent No. 2's objections were considered insufficient, and the Tribunal upheld the Department's appeal, directing restoration of the company's name in the register. en-us Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:36:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426966 The Income Tax Department filed an appeal under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for the restoration of the respondent company's name in the register. The Tribunal found restoration necessary to prevent tax evasion and protect revenue interests. The Tribunal asserted its jurisdiction to hear the appeal, emphasizing its authority to adjudicate on the matter. The appeal filed by the Income Tax Department was deemed valid, allowing for the restoration of the company's name to conclude pending assessment proceedings and enforce tax liabilities. Respondent No. 2's objections were considered insufficient, and the Tribunal upheld the Department's appeal, directing restoration of the company's name in the register. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 25 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426966