<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1200 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and concluding that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism for services provided by TTL Korea to TDCV Korea. Consequently, there was no basis for interest or penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 08:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1200 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and concluding that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism for services provided by TTL Korea to TDCV Korea. Consequently, there was no basis for interest or penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>