https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426956 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) decision to close the case under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002. It found no evidence of contravention of Sections 3 or 4, as there was neither an agreement among the Opposite Parties (OPs) nor any abuse of dominance in the relevant market for smart home solutions. The Tribunal noted the procedural lapse of failing to implead the CCI as a party but proceeded based on available records. It concluded that the dispute was more consumer or commercial in nature, outside the Competition Act's scope, and emphasized the market's competitiveness with multiple players. The appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Aug 2022 07:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426956 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) decision to close the case under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002. It found no evidence of contravention of Sections 3 or 4, as there was neither an agreement among the Opposite Parties (OPs) nor any abuse of dominance in the relevant market for smart home solutions. The Tribunal noted the procedural lapse of failing to implead the CCI as a party but proceeded based on available records. It concluded that the dispute was more consumer or commercial in nature, outside the Competition Act's scope, and emphasized the market's competitiveness with multiple players. The appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 29 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426956