<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1192 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426953</link>
    <description>The Court invalidated the reopening of assessments for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 under Section 148(1) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the revenue authorities failed to establish non-disclosure of material facts by the petitioner, emphasizing the need for clear and unambiguous reasons for reassessment. The Court set aside the notices and orders, ruling in favor of the petitioner due to the absence of allegations regarding inadequate disclosure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:32:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1192 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426953</link>
      <description>The Court invalidated the reopening of assessments for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 under Section 148(1) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the revenue authorities failed to establish non-disclosure of material facts by the petitioner, emphasizing the need for clear and unambiguous reasons for reassessment. The Court set aside the notices and orders, ruling in favor of the petitioner due to the absence of allegations regarding inadequate disclosure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>