https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426921 Article 227 supervisory interference with arbitral orders is confined to rare cases of patent lack of inherent jurisdiction, bad faith, or comparable exceptional infirmity. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is treated as a self-contained code with a limited challenge scheme, so a debatable procedural or adjudicatory view taken by the Tribunal within its remit does not justify constitutional intervention. On the facts discussed, the Tribunal's decision to hear the claim and counterclaim together, and to leave the effect of the insolvency moratorium to the enforcement stage, was treated as an adjudicatory choice rather than a jurisdictional nullity. The commentary states that no basis existed for Article 227 interference. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Aug 2022 16:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426921 Article 227 supervisory interference with arbitral orders is confined to rare cases of patent lack of inherent jurisdiction, bad faith, or comparable exceptional infirmity. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is treated as a self-contained code with a limited challenge scheme, so a debatable procedural or adjudicatory view taken by the Tribunal within its remit does not justify constitutional intervention. On the facts discussed, the Tribunal's decision to hear the claim and counterclaim together, and to leave the effect of the insolvency moratorium to the enforcement stage, was treated as an adjudicatory choice rather than a jurisdictional nullity. The commentary states that no basis existed for Article 227 interference. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426921