<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1157 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426918</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority had attained finality and could not be reopened based on the subsequent overruling judgment. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of prospective overruling, finality of judgments, and res judicata to prevent endless litigation and ensure the stability of legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2022 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1157 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426918</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority had attained finality and could not be reopened based on the subsequent overruling judgment. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of prospective overruling, finality of judgments, and res judicata to prevent endless litigation and ensure the stability of legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>