https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303958 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's judgment, dismissing the appeal against acquittal. The notice sent by the complainant was found insufficient, vague, and illegal, failing to comply with the statutory requirements of Sections 138(b) and (c) of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court emphasized the necessity of a valid and properly served notice as the basis for a case under Section 138 of the Act. The accused's defense of no debt or liability was accepted, leading to the acquittal as the complainant failed to substantiate the claim and the notice was defective. en-us Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 28 Aug 2022 12:56:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303958 The High Court upheld the Trial Court's judgment, dismissing the appeal against acquittal. The notice sent by the complainant was found insufficient, vague, and illegal, failing to comply with the statutory requirements of Sections 138(b) and (c) of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court emphasized the necessity of a valid and properly served notice as the basis for a case under Section 138 of the Act. The accused's defense of no debt or liability was accepted, leading to the acquittal as the complainant failed to substantiate the claim and the notice was defective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303958