<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 230 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30249</link>
    <description>HC held that Section 44BB applies to the aggregate amounts paid, payable, received or deemed received (not merely income or accrued income) when computing deemed profits at 10%. The court found ITAT erred in conflating &quot;amount&quot; with &quot;income,&quot; concluded Section 44BB is a self-contained code creating a legal fiction, set aside ITAT and CIT(A) orders, and confirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition. Decision is for the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 230 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30249</link>
      <description>HC held that Section 44BB applies to the aggregate amounts paid, payable, received or deemed received (not merely income or accrued income) when computing deemed profits at 10%. The court found ITAT erred in conflating &quot;amount&quot; with &quot;income,&quot; concluded Section 44BB is a self-contained code creating a legal fiction, set aside ITAT and CIT(A) orders, and confirmed the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition. Decision is for the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>