<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1134 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426895</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the appellate order sustaining the assessment, and canceled the penalty of Rs. 51,993/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal held that the penalty was not justified as the computational error was due to inadvertent mistake, not an attempt to conceal income. The tribunal emphasized adherence to principles of natural justice and cited a Supreme Court judgment to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 08:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1134 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426895</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the appellate order sustaining the assessment, and canceled the penalty of Rs. 51,993/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal held that the penalty was not justified as the computational error was due to inadvertent mistake, not an attempt to conceal income. The tribunal emphasized adherence to principles of natural justice and cited a Supreme Court judgment to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>