<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1126 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was based on the finding that the mistake in not adding back the loss on sale of assets was inadvertent and not indicative of willful suppression of facts or intent to evade tax, as supported by the details provided by the assessee and the precedent set by the Supreme Court in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 08:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1126 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act. The decision was based on the finding that the mistake in not adding back the loss on sale of assets was inadvertent and not indicative of willful suppression of facts or intent to evade tax, as supported by the details provided by the assessee and the precedent set by the Supreme Court in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>