<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1123 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It directed the AO to disallow the outstanding Sales Tax/Works Contract Tax liability to the extent included in the statement showing deviations from the valuation method under Section 145A. The Tribunal upheld that Section 43B applies even if the liability isn&#039;t in the Profit &amp;amp; Loss Account, as long as the deduction was effectively claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2022 08:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1123 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It directed the AO to disallow the outstanding Sales Tax/Works Contract Tax liability to the extent included in the statement showing deviations from the valuation method under Section 145A. The Tribunal upheld that Section 43B applies even if the liability isn&#039;t in the Profit &amp;amp; Loss Account, as long as the deduction was effectively claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>