<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 218 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30238</link>
    <description>CESTAT, Mumbai held that silver residue arising during cinematographic film processing, classified under Chapter 26, was covered by the applicable exemption notification, and the absence of Modvat credit on inputs supported that treatment. The chemical solution was treated as a photographic chemical preparation under Chapter 37.07 and was also within the scope of the exemption notification. As both products satisfied the notification conditions, excise duty could not be demanded and the revenue&#039;s claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 218 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30238</link>
      <description>CESTAT, Mumbai held that silver residue arising during cinematographic film processing, classified under Chapter 26, was covered by the applicable exemption notification, and the absence of Modvat credit on inputs supported that treatment. The chemical solution was treated as a photographic chemical preparation under Chapter 37.07 and was also within the scope of the exemption notification. As both products satisfied the notification conditions, excise duty could not be demanded and the revenue&#039;s claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>