https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303946 Publication of an advertisement using an impugned trade mark in a newspaper circulated in Madras was treated as infringing use because it could mislead the public into believing the goods were connected with the trade mark owner. The court also held that part of the cause of action arose in Madras for territorial jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, since the registered trade mark was located there and was used and exploited there. Actual sale in Madras was not necessary. Leave to sue was therefore maintainable and the refusal of leave was set aside. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:19:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303946 Publication of an advertisement using an impugned trade mark in a newspaper circulated in Madras was treated as infringing use because it could mislead the public into believing the goods were connected with the trade mark owner. The court also held that part of the cause of action arose in Madras for territorial jurisdiction under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, since the registered trade mark was located there and was used and exploited there. Actual sale in Madras was not necessary. Leave to sue was therefore maintainable and the refusal of leave was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303946